To Our Venerable
Brethren the Patriarchs, Primates,
Archbishops, Bishops, and other Ordinaries in Peace and
Communion with the Apostolic See.
The Catholic Church, that imperishable handiwork of our all-merciful
God, has for her immediate and natural purpose the saving of souls and
securing our happiness in heaven. Yet, in regard to things temporal,
she is the source of benefits as manifold and great as if the chief end
of her existence were to ensure the prospering of our earthly life.
And, indeed, wherever the Church has set her foot she has straightway
changed the face of things, and has attempered the moral tone of the
people with a new civilization and with virtues before unknown. All
nations which have yielded to her sway have become eminent by their
gentleness, their sense of justice, and the glory of their high deeds.
2. And yet a hackneyed reproach of old date is levelled against her,
that the Church is opposed to the rightful aims of the civil
government, and is wholly unable to afford help in spreading that
welfare and progress which justly and naturally are sought after by
every well-regulated State. From the very beginning Christians were
harassed by slanderous accusations of this nature, and on that account
were held up to hatred and execration, for being (so they were called)
enemies of the Empire. The Christian religion was moreover commonly
charged with being the cause of the calamities that so frequently
befell the State, whereas, in very truth, just punishment was being
awarded to guilty nations by an avenging God. This odious calumny, with
most valid reason, nerved the genius and sharpened the pen of St.
Augustine, who, notably in his treatise, The City of God, set forth in
so bright a light the worth of Christian wisdom in its relation to the
public wealth that he seems not merely to have pleaded the cause of the
Christians of his day, but to have refuted for all future times
impeachments so grossly contrary to truth. The wicked proneness,
however, to levy like charges and accusations has not been lulled to
rest. Many, indeed, are they who have tried to work out a plan of civil
society based on doctrines other than those approved by the Catholic
Church. Nay, in these latter days a novel conception of law has begun
here and there to gain increase and influence, the outcome, as it is
maintained, of an age arrived at full stature, and the result of
progressive liberty. But, though endeavours of various kinds have been
ventured on, it is clear that no better mode has been devised for the
building up and ruling the State than that which is the necessary
growth of the teachings of the Gospel. We deem it, therefore, of the
highest moment, and a strict duty of Our apostolic office, to contrast
with the lessons taught by Christ the novel theories now advanced
touching the State. By this means We cherish hope that the bright
shining of the truth may scatter the mists of error and doubt, so that
one and all may see clearly the imperious law of life which they are
bound to follow and obey.
3. It is not difficult to determine what would be the form and
character of the State were it governed according to the principles of
Christian philosophy. Man's natural instinct moves him to live in civil
society, for he cannot, if dwelling apart, provide himself with the
necessary requirements of life, nor procure the means of developing his
mental and moral faculties. Hence, it is divinely ordained that he
should lead his life-be it family, or civil-with his fellow men,
amongst whom alone his several wants can be adequately supplied. But,
as no society can hold together unless some one be over all, directing
all to strive earnestly for the common good, every body politic must
have a ruling authority, and this authority, no less than society
itself, has its source in nature, and has, consequently, God for its
Author. Hence, it follows that all public power must proceed from God.
For God alone is the true and supreme Lord of the world. Everything,
without exception, must be subject to Him, and must serve him, so that
whosoever holds the right to govern holds it from one sole and single
source, namely, God, the sovereign Ruler of all. "There is no power but
from God."(1)
4. The right to rule is not necessarily, however, bound up with any
special mode of government. It may take this or that form, provided
only that it be of a nature of the government, rulers must ever bear in
mind that God is the paramount ruler of the world, and must set Him
before themselves as their exemplar and law in the administration of
the State. For, in things visible God has fashioned secondary causes,
in which His divine action can in some wise be discerned, leading up to
the end to which the course of the world is ever tending. In like
manner, in civil society, God has always willed that there should be a
ruling authority, and that they who are invested with it should reflect
the divine power and providence in some measure over the human race.
5. They, therefore, who rule should rule with evenhanded justice, not
as masters, but rather as fathers, for the rule of God over man is most
just, and is tempered always with a father's kindness. Government
should, moreover, be administered for the well-being of the citizens,
because they who govern others possess authority solely for the welfare
of the State. Furthermore, the civil power must not be subservient to
the advantage of any one individual or of some few persons, inasmuch as
it was established for the common good of all. But, if those who are in
authority rule unjustly, if they govern overbearingly or arrogantly,
and if their measures prove hurtful to the people, they must remember
that the Almighty will one day bring them to account, the more strictly
in proportion to the sacredness of their office and preeminence of
their dignity. "The mighty shall be mightily tormented."(2) Then,
truly, will the majesty of the law meet with the dutiful and willing
homage of the people, when they are convinced that their rulers hold
authority from God, and feel that it is a matter of justice and duty to
obey them, and to show them reverence and fealty, united to a love not
unlike that which children show their parents. "Let every soul be
subject to higher powers."(3) To despise legitimate authority, in
whomsoever vested, is unlawful, as a rebellion against the divine will,
and whoever resists that, rushes willfully to destruction. "He that
resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God, and they that
resist, purchase to themselves damnation."(4) To cast aside obedience,
and by popular violence to incite to revolt, is therefore treason, not
against man only, but against God.
6. As a consequence, the State, constituted as it is, is clearly bound
to act up to the manifold and weighty duties linking it to God, by the
public profession of religion. Nature and reason, which command every
individual devoutly to worship God in holiness, because we belong to
Him and must return to Him, since from Him we came, bind also the civil
community by a like law. For, men living together in society are under
the power of God no less than individuals are, and society, no less
than individuals, owes gratitude to God who gave it being and maintains
it and whose ever-bounteous goodness enriches it with countless
blessings. Since, then, no one is allowed to be remiss in the service
due to God, and since the chief duty of all men is to cling to religion
in both its reaching and practice-not such religion as they may have a
preference for, but the religion which God enjoins, and which certain
and most clear marks show to be the only one true religion -it is a
public crime to act as though there were no God. So, too, is it a sin
for the State not to have care for religion as a something beyond its
scope, or as of no practical benefit; or out of many forms of religion
to adopt that one which chimes in with the fancy; for we are bound
absolutely to worship God in that way which He has shown to be His
will. All who rule, therefore, would hold in honour the holy name of
God, and one of their chief duties must be to favour religion, to
protect it, to shield it under the credit and sanction of the laws, and
neither to organize nor enact any measure that may compromise its
safety. This is the bounden duty of rulers to the people over whom they
rule. For one and all are we destined by our birth and adoption to
enjoy, when this frail and fleeting life is ended, a supreme and final
good in heaven, and to the attainment of this every endeavour should be
directed. Since, then, upon this depends the full and perfect happiness
of mankind, the securing of this end should be of all imaginable
interests the most urgent. Hence, civil society, established for the
common welfare, should not only safeguard the well-being of the
community, but have also at heart the interests of its individual
members, in such mode as not in any way to hinder, but in every manner
to render as easy as may be, the possession of that highest and
unchangeable good for which all should seek. Wherefore, for this
purpose, care must especially be taken to preserve unharmed and
unimpeded the religion whereof the practice is the link connecting man
with God.
7. Now, it cannot be difficult to find out which is the true religion,
if only it be sought with an earnest and unbiased mind; for proofs are
abundant and striking. We have, for example, the fulfilment of
prophecies, miracles in great numbers, the rapid spread of the faith in
the midst of enemies and in face of overwhelming obstacles, the witness
of the martyrs, and the like. From all these it is evident that the
only true religion is the one established by Jesus Christ Himself, and
which He committed to His Church to protect and to propagate.
8. For the only-begotten Son of God established on earth a society
which is called the Church, and to it He handed over the exalted and
divine office which He had received from His Father, to be continued
through the ages to come. "As the Father hath sent Me, I also send
you."' "Behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the
world."(6) Consequently, as Jesus Christ came into the world that men
"might have life and have it more abundantly,"(7) so also has the
Church for its aim and end the eternal salvation of souls, and hence it
is so constituted as to open wide its arms to all mankind, unhampered
by any limit of either time or place. "Preach ye the Gospel to every
creature."(8)
9. Over this mighty multitude God has Himself set rulers with power to
govern, and He has willed that one should be the head of all, and the
chief and unerring teacher of truth, to whom He has given "the keys of
the kingdom of heaven."(9) "Feed My lambs, feed My sheep."(10) "I have
prayed for thee that thy faith fail not."(11)
10. This society is made up of men, just as civil society is, and yet
is supernatural and spiritual, on account of the end for which it was
founded, and of the means by which it aims at attaining that end.
Hence, it is distinguished and differs from civil society, and, what is
of highest moment, it is a society chartered as of right divine,
perfect in its nature and in its title, to possess in itself and by
itself, through the will and loving kindness of its Founder, all
needful provision for its maintenance and action. And just as the end
at which the Church aims is by far the noblest of ends, so is its
authority the most exalted of all authority, nor can it be looked upon
as inferior to the civil power, or in any manner dependent upon it.
11. In very truth, Jesus Christ gave to His Apostles unrestrained
authority in regard to things sacred, together with the genuine and
most true power of making laws, as also with the twofold right of
judging and of punishing, which flow from that power. "All power is
given to Me in heaven and on earth: going therefore teach all
nations... teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have
commanded you."(12) And in another place: "If he will not hear them,
tell the Church."(13) And again: "In readiness to revenge all
disobedience."(14) And once more: "That... I may not deal more severely
according to the power which the Lord bath given me, unto edification
and not unto destruction."(15) Hence, it is the Church, and not the
State, that is to be man's guide to heaven. It is to the Church that
God has assigned the charge of seeing to, and legislating for, all that
concerns religion; of teaching all nations; of spreading the
Christian faith as widely as possible; in short, of administering
freely and without hindrance, in accordance with her own judgment, all
matters that fall within its competence.
12. Now, this authority, perfect in itself, and plainly meant to be
unfettered, so long assailed by a philosophy that truckles to the
State, the Church, has never ceased to claim for herself and openly to
exercise. The Apostles themselves were the first to uphold it, when,
being forbidden by the rulers of the synagogue to preach the Gospel,
they courageously answered: "We must obey God rather than men."(16)
This same authority the holy Fathers of the Church were always careful
to maintain by weighty arguments, according as occasion arose, and the
Roman Pontiffs have never shrunk from defending it with unbending
constancy. Nay, more, princes and all invested with power to rule have
themselves approved it, in theory alike and in practice. It cannot be
called in question that in the making of treaties, in the transaction
of business matters, in the sending and receiving ambassadors, and in
the interchange of other kinds of official dealings they have been wont
to treat with the Church as with a supreme and legitimate power. And,
assuredly, all ought to hold that it was not without a singular
disposition of God's providence that this power of the Church was
provided with a civil sovereignty as the surest safeguard of her
independence.
13. The Almighty, therefore, has given the charge of the human race to
two powers, the ecclesiastical and the civil, the one being set over
divine, and the other over human, things. Each in its kind is supreme,
each has fixed limits within which it is contained, limits which are
defined by the nature and special object of the province of each, so
that there is, we may say, an orbit traced out within which the action
of each is brought into play by its own native right. But, inasmuch as
each of these two powers has authority over the same subjects, and as
it might come to pass that one and the same thing-related differently,
but still remaining one and the same thing-might belong to the
jurisdiction and determination of both, therefore God, who foresees all
things, and who is the author of these two powers, has marked out the
course of each in right correlation to the other. "For the powers that
are, are ordained of God."!(17) Were this not so, deplorable
contentions and conflicts would often arise, and, not infrequently,
men, like travellers at the meeting of two roads, would hesitate in
anxiety and doubt, not knowing what course to follow. Two powers would
be commanding contrary things, and it would be a dereliction of duty to
disobey either of the two.
14. But it would be most repugnant to them to think thus of the wisdom
and goodness of God. Even in physical things, albeit of a lower order,
the Almighty has so combined the forces and springs of nature with
tempered action and wondrous harmony that no one of them clashes with
any other, and all of them most fitly and aptly work together for the
great purpose of the universe. There must, accordingly, exist between
these two powers a certain orderly connection, which may be compared to
the union of the soul and body in man. The nature and scope of that
connection can be determined only, as We have laid down, by having
regard to the nature of each power, and by taking account of the
relative excellence and nobleness of their purpose. One of the two has
for its proximate and chief object the well-being of this mortal life;
the other, the everlasting joys of heaven. Whatever, therefore in
things human is of a sacred character, whatever belongs either of its
own nature or by reason of the end to which it is referred, to the
salvation of souls, or to the worship of God, is subject to the power
and judgment of the Church. Whatever is to be ranged under the civil
and political order is rightly subject to the civil authority. Jesus
Christ has Himself given command that what is Caesar's is to be
rendered to Caesar, and that what belongs to God is to be rendered to
God.
15. There are, nevertheless, occasions when another method of concord
is available for the sake of peace and liberty: We mean when rulers of
the State and the Roman Pontiff come to an understanding touching some
special matter. At such times the Church gives signal proof of her
motherly love by showing the greatest possible kindliness and
indulgence.
16. Such, then, as We have briefly pointed out, is the Christian
organization of civil society; not rashly or fancifully shaped out, but
educed from the highest and truest principles, confirmed by natural
reason itself.
17. In such organization of the State there is nothing that can be
thought to infringe upon the dignity of rulers, and nothing unbecoming
them; nay, so far from degrading the sovereign power in its due rights,
it adds to it permanence and luster. Indeed, when more fully pondered,
this mutual co-ordination has a perfection in which all other forms of
government are lacking, and from which excellent results would flow,
were the several component parts to keep their place and duly discharge
the office and work appointed respectively for each. And, doubtless, in
the constitution of the State such as We have described, divine and
human things are equitably shared; the rights of citizens assured to
them, and fenced round by divine, by natural, and by human law; the
duties incumbent on each one being wisely marked out, and their
fulfilment fittingly insured. In their uncertain and toilsome journey
to the everlasting city all see that they have safe guides and helpers
on their way, and are conscious that others have charge to protect
their persons alike and their possessions, and to obtain or preserve
for them everything essential for their present life. Furthermore,
domestic society acquires that firmness and solidity so needful to it
from the holiness of marriage, one and indissoluble, wherein the rights
and duties of husband and wife are controlled with wise justice and
equity; due honour is assured to the woman; the authority of the
husband is conformed to the pattern afforded by the authority of God;
the power of the father is tempered by a due regard for the dignity of
the mother and her offspring; and the best possible provision is made
for the guardianship, welfare, and education of the children.
18. In political affairs, and all matters civil, the laws aim at
securing the common good, and are not framed according to the delusive
caprices and opinions of the mass of the people, but by truth and by
justice; the ruling powers are invested with a sacredness more than
human, and are withheld from deviating from the path of duty, and from
overstepping the bounds of rightful authority; and the obedience is not
the servitude of man to man, but submission to the will of God,
exercising His sovereignty through the medium of men. Now, this being
recognized as undeniable, it is felt that the high office of rulers
should be held in respect; that public authority should be constantly
and faithfully obeyed; that no act of sedition should be committed; and
that the civic order of the commonwealth should be maintained as sacred.
19. So, also, as to the duties of each one toward his fellow men,
mutual forbearance, kindliness, generosity are placed in the ascendant;
the man who is at once a citizen and a Christian is not drawn aside by
conflicting obligations; and, lastly, the abundant benefits with which
the Christian religion, of its very nature, endows even the mortal life
of man are acquired for the community and civil society. And this to
such an extent that it may be said in sober truth: "The condition of
the commonwealth depends on the religion with which God is worshipped;
and between one and the other there exists an intimate and abiding
connection."(18)
20. Admirably, according to his wont, does St. Augustine, in many
passages, enlarge upon the nature of these advantages; but nowhere more
markedly and to the point than when he addresses the Catholic Church in
the following words: "Thou dost teach and train children with much
tenderness, young men with much vigour, old men with much gentleness;
as the age not of the body alone, but of the mind of each requires.
Women thou dost subject to their husbands in chaste and faithful
obedience, not for the gratifying of their lust, but for bringing forth
children, and for having a share in the family concerns. Thou dost set
husbands over their wives, not that they may play false to the weaker
sex, but according to the requirements of sincere affection. Thou dost
subject children to their parents in a kind of free service, and dost
establish parents over their children with a benign rule. . . Thou
joinest together, not in society only, but in a sort of brotherhood,
citizen with citizen, nation with nation, and the whole race of men, by
reminding them of their common parentage. Thou teachest kings to look
to the interests of their people, and dost admonish the people to be
submissive to their kings. With all care dost thou teach all to whom
honour is due, and affection, and reverence, and fear, consolation, and
admonition and exhortation, and discipline, and reproach, and
punishment. Thou showest that all these are not equally incumbent on
all, but that charity is owing to all, and wrongdoing to none."(19) And
in another place, blaming the false wisdom of certain time-serving
philosophers, he observes: "Let those who say that the teaching of
Christ is hurtful to the State produce such armies as the maxims of
Jesus have enjoined soldiers to bring into being; such governors of
provinces; such husbands and wives; such parents and children; such
masters and servants; such kings; such judges, and such payers and
collectors of tribute, as the Christian teaching instructs them to
become, and then let them dare to say that such teaching is hurtful to
the State. Nay, rather will they hesitate to own that this discipline,
if duly acted up to, is the very mainstay of the commonwealth."(20)
21. There was once a time when States were governed by the philosophy
of the Gospel. Then it was that the power and divine virtue of
Christian wisdom had diffused itself throughout the laws, institutions,
and morals of the people, permeating all ranks and relations of civil
society. Then, too, the religion instituted by Jesus Christ,
established firmly in befitting dignity, flourished everywhere, by the
favour of princes and the legitimate protection of magistrates; and
Church and State were happily united in concord and friendly
interchange of good offices. The State, constituted in this wise, bore
fruits important beyond all expectation, whose remembrance is still,
and always will be, in renown, witnessed to as they are by countless
proofs which can never be blotted out or ever obscured by any craft of
any enemies. Christian Europe has subdued barbarous nations, and
changed them from a savage to a civilized condition, from superstition
to true worship. It victoriously rolled back the tide of Mohammedan
conquest; retained the headship of civilization; stood forth in the
front rank as the leader and teacher of all, in every branch of
national culture; bestowed on the world the gift of true and many-sided
liberty; and most wisely founded very numerous institutions for the
solace of human suffering. And if we inquire how it was able to bring
about so altered a condition of things, the answer is-beyond all
question, in large measure, through religion, under whose auspices so
many great undertakings were set on foot, through whose aid they were
brought to completion.
22. A similar state of things would certainly have continued had the
agreement of the two powers been lasting. More important results even
might have been justly looked for, had obedience waited upon the
authority, teaching, and counsels of the Church, and had this
submission been specially marked by greater and more unswerving
loyalty. For that should be regarded in the light of an ever-changeless
law which No of Chartres wrote to Pope Paschal II: "When kingdom and
priesthood are at one, in complete accord, the world is well ruled, and
the Church flourishes, and brings forth abundant fruit. But when they
are at variance, not only smaller interests prosper not, but even
things of greatest moment fall into deplorable decay."(21)
23. But that harmful and deplorable passion for innovation which was
aroused in the sixteenth century threw first of all into confusion the
Christian religion, and next, by natural sequence, invaded the
precincts of philosophy, whence it spread amongst all classes of
society. From this source, as from a fountain-head, burst forth all
those later tenets of unbridled license which, in the midst of the
terrible unheavals of the last century, were wildly conceived and
boldly proclaimed as the principles and foundation of that new
conception of law which was not merely previously unknown, but was at
variance on many points with not only the Christian, but even the
natural law.
24. Amongst these principles the main one lays down that as all men are
alike by race and nature, so in like manner all are equal in the
control of their life; that each one is so far his own master as to be
in no sense under the rule of any other individual; that each is free
to think on every subject just as he may choose, and to do whatever he
may like to do; that no man has any right to rule over other men. In a
society grounded upon such maxims all government is nothing more nor
less than the will of the people, and the people, being under the power
of itself alone, is alone its own ruler. It does choose, nevertheless,
some to whose charge it may commit itself, but in such wise that it
makes over to them not the right so much as the business of governing,
to be exercised, however, in its name.
25. The authority of God is passed over in silence, just as if there
were no God; or as if He cared nothing for human society; or as if men,
whether in their individual capacity or bound together in social
relations, owed nothing to God; or as if there could be a government of
which the whole origin and power and authority did not reside in God
Himself. Thus, as is evident, a State becomes nothing but a multitude
which is its own master and ruler. And since the people is declared to
contain within itself the spring-head of all rights and of all power,
it follows that the State does not consider itself bound by any kind of
duty toward God. Moreover, it believes that it is not obliged to make
public profession of any religion; or to inquire which of the very many
religions is the only one true; or to prefer one religion to all the
rest; or to show to any form of religion special favour; but, on the
contrary, is bound to grant equal rights to every creed, so that public
order may not be disturbed by any particular form of religious belief.
26. And it is a part of this theory that all questions that concern
religion are to be referred to private judgment; that every one is to
be free to follow whatever religion he prefers, or none at all if he
disapprove of all. From this the following consequences logically flow:
that the judgment of each one's conscience is independent of all law;
that the most unrestrained opinions may be openly expressed as to the
practice or omission of divine worship; and that every one has
unbounded license to think whatever he chooses and to publish abroad
whatever he thinks.
27. Now, when the State rests on foundations like those just named -
and for the time being they are greatly in favor - it readily appears
into what and how unrightful a position the Church is driven. For, when
the management of public business is in harmony with doctrines of such
a kind, the Catholic religion is allowed a standing in civil society
equal only, or inferior, to societies alien from it; no regard is paid
to the laws of the Church, and she who, by the order and commission of
Jesus Christ, has the duty of teaching all nations, finds herself
forbidden to take any part in the instruction of the people. With
reference to matters that are of twofold jurisdiction, they who
administer the civil power lay down the law at their own will, and in
matters that appertain to religion defiantly put aside the most sacred
decrees of the Church. They claim jurisdiction over the marriages of
Catholics, even over the bond as well as the unity and the
indissolubility of matrimony. They lay hands on the goods of the
clergy, contending that the Church cannot possess property. Lastly,
they treat the Church with such arrogance that, rejecting entirely her
title to the nature and rights of a perfect society, they hold that she
differs in no respect from other societies in the State, and for this
reason possesses no right nor any legal power of action, save that
which she holds by the concession and favor of the government. If in
any State the Church retains her own agreement publicly entered into by
the two powers, men forthwith begin to cry out that matters affecting
the Church must be separated from those of the State.
28. Their object in uttering this cry is to be able to violate
unpunished their plighted faith, and in all things to have unchecked
control. And as the Church, unable to abandon her chiefest and most
sacred duties, cannot patiently put up with this, and asks that the
pledge given to her be fully and scrupulously acted up to, contentions
frequently arise between the ecclesiastical and the civil power, of
which the issue commonly is that the weaker power yields to the one
which is stronger in human resources.
29. Accordingly, it has become the practice and determination under
this condition of public polity (now so much admired by many) either to
forbid the action of the Church altogether, or to keep her in check and
bondage to the State. Public enactments are in great measure framed
with this design. The drawing up of laws, the administration of State
affairs, the godless education of youth, the spoliation and suppression
of religious orders, the overthrow of the temporal power of the Roman
Pontiff, all alike aim to this one end-to paralyse the action of
Christian institutions, to cramp to the utmost the freedom of the
Catholic Church, and to curtail her ever single prerogative.
30. Now, natural reason itself proves convincingly that such concepts
of the government of a State are wholly at variance with the truth.
Nature itself bears witness that all power, of every kind, has its
origin from God, who is its chief and most august source.
31. The sovereignty of the people, however, and this without any
reference to God, is held to reside in the multitude; which is
doubtless a doctrine exceedingly well calculated to flatter and to
inflame many passions, but which lacks all reasonable proof, and all
power of insuring public safety and preserving order. Indeed, from the
prevalence of this teaching, things have come to such a pass that may
hold as an axiom of civil jurisprudence that seditions may be
rightfully fostered. For the opinion prevails that princes are nothing
more than delegates chosen to carry out the will of the people; whence
it necessarily follows that all things are as changeable as the will of
the people, so that risk of public disturbance is ever hanging over our
heads. To hold, therefore, that there is no difference in matters of
religion between forms that are unlike each other, and even contrary to
each other, most clearly leads in the end to the rejection of all
religion in both theory and practice. And this is the same thing as
atheism, however it may differ from it in name. Men who really believe
in the existence of God must, in order to be consistent with themselves
and to avoid absurd conclusions, understand that differing modes of
divine worship involving dissimilarity and conflict even on most
important points cannot all be equally probable, equally good, and
equally acceptable to God.
32. So, too, the liberty of thinking, and of publishing, whatsoever
each one likes, without any hindrance, is not in itself an advantage
over which society can wisely rejoice. On the contrary, it is the
fountain-head and origin of many evils. Liberty is a power perfecting
man, and hence should have truth and goodness for its object. But the
character of goodness and truth cannot be changed at option. These
remain ever one and the same, and are no less unchangeable than nature
itself. If the mind assents to false opinions, and the will chooses and
follows after what is wrong, neither can attain its native fullness,
but both must fall from their native dignity into an abyss of
corruption. Whatever, therefore, is opposed to virtue and truth may not
rightly be brought temptingly before the eye of man, much less
sanctioned by the favor and protection of the law. A well-spent life is
the only way to heaven, whither all are bound, and on this account the
State is acting against the laws and dictates of nature whenever it
permits the license of opinion and of action to lead minds astray from
truth and souls away from the practice of virtue. To exclude the
Church, founded by God Himself, from life, from laws, from the
education of youth, from domestic society is a grave and fatal error. A
State from which religion is banished can never be well regulated; and
already perhaps more than is desirable is known of the nature and
tendency of the so-called civil philosophy of life and morals. The
Church of Christ is the true and sole teacher of virtue and guardian of
morals. She it is who preserves in their purity the principles from
which duties flow, and, by setting forth most urgent reasons for
virtuous life, bids us not only to turn away from wicked deeds, but
even to curb all movements of the mind that are opposed to reason, even
though they be not carried out in action.
33. To wish the Church to be subject to the civil power in the exercise
of her duty is a great folly and a sheer injustice. Whenever this is
the case, order is disturbed, for things natural are put above things
supernatural; the many benefits which the Church, if free to act, would
confer on society are either prevented or at least lessened in number;
and a way is prepared for enmities and contentions between the two
powers, with how evil result to both the issue of events has taught us
only too frequently.
34. Doctrines such as these, which cannot be approved by human reason,
and most seriously affect the whole civil order, Our predecessors the
Roman Pontiffs (well aware of what their apostolic office required of
them) have never allowed to pass uncondemned. Thus, Gregory XVI in his
encyclical letter Mirari Vos, dated August 15, 1832, inveighed with
weighty words against the sophisms which even at his time were being
publicly inculcated-namely, that no preference should be shown for any
particular form of worship; that it is right for individuals to form
their own personal judgments about religion; that each man's conscience
is his sole and all-sufficing guide; and that it is lawful for every
man to publish his own views, whatever they may be, and even to
conspire against the State. On the question of the separation of Church
and State the same Pontiff writes as follows: "Nor can We hope for
happier results either for religion or for the civil government from
the wishes of those who desire that the Church be separated from the
State, and the concord between the secular and ecclesiastical authority
be dissolved. It is clear that these men, who yearn for a shameless
liberty, live in dread of an agreement which has always been fraught
with good, and advantageous alike to sacred and civil interests." To
the like effect, also, as occasion presented itself, did Pius IX brand
publicly many false opinions which were gaining ground, and afterwards
ordered them to be condensed in summary form in order that in this sea
of error Catholics might have a light which they might safely
follow.(22)
35. From these pronouncements of the Popes it is evident that the
origin of public power is to be sought for in God Himself, and not in
the multitude, and that it is repugnant to reason to allow free scope
for sedition. Again, that it is not lawful for the State, any more than
for the individual, either to disregard all religious duties or to hold
in equal favour different kinds of religion; that the unrestrained
freedom of thinking and of openly making known one's thoughts is not
inherent in the rights of citizens, and is by no means to be reckoned
worthy of favour and support. In like manner it is to be understood
that the Church no less than the State itself is a society perfect in
its own nature and its own right, and that those who exercise
sovereignty ought not so to act as to compel the Church to become
subservient or subject to them, or to hamper her liberty in the
management of her own affairs, or to despoil her in any way of the
other privileges conferred upon her by Jesus Christ. In matters,
however, of mixed jurisdiction, it is in the highest degree consonant
to nature, as also to the designs of God, that so far from one of the
powers separating itself from the other, or still less coming into
conflict with it, complete harmony, such as is suited to the end for
which each power exists, should be preserved between them.
36. This, then, is the teaching of the Catholic Church concerning the
constitution and government of the State. By the words and decrees just
cited, if judged dispassionately, no one of the several forms of
government is in itself condemned, inasmuch as none of them contains
anything contrary to Catholic doctrine, and all of them are capable, if
wisely and justly managed, to insure the welfare of the State. Neither
is it blameworthy in itself, in any manner, for the people to have a
share greater or less, in the government: for at certain times, and
under certain laws, such participation may not only be of benefit to
the citizens, but may even be of obligation. Nor is there any reason
why any one should accuse the Church of being wanting in gentleness of
action or largeness of view, or of being opposed to real and lawful
liberty. The Church, indeed, deems it unlawful to place the various
forms of divine worship on the same footing as the true religion, but
does not, on that account, condemn those rulers who, for the sake of
securing some great good or of hindering some great evil, allow
patiently custom or usage to be a kind of sanction for each kind of
religion having its place in the State. And, in fact, the Church is
wont to take earnest heed that no one shall be forced to embrace the
Catholic faith against his will, for, as St. Augustine wisely reminds
us, "Man cannot believe otherwise than of his own will."
37. In the same way the Church cannot approve of that liberty which
begets a contempt of the most sacred laws of God, and casts off the
obedience due to lawful authority, for this is not liberty so much as
license, and is most correctly styled by St. Augustine the "liberty of
self ruin," and by the Apostle St. Peter the "cloak of malice."(23)
Indeed, since it is opposed to reason, it is a true slavery, "for
whosoever committeth sin is the slave of sin."(24) On the other hand,
that liberty is truly genuine, and to be sought after, which in regard
to the individual does not allow men to be the slaves of error and of
passion, the worst of all masters; which, too, in public administration
guides the citizens in wisdom and provides for them increased means of
well-being; and which, further, protects the State from foreign
interference.
38. This honourable liberty, alone worthy of human beings, the Church
approves most highly and has never slackened her endeavour to preserve,
strong and unchanged, among nations. And, in truth, whatever in the
State is of chief avail for the common welfare; whatever has been
usefully established to curb the license of rulers who are opposed to
the true interests of the people, or to keep in check the leading
authorities from unwarrantably interfering in municipal or family
affairs; whatever tends to uphold the honour, manhood, and equal rights
of individual citizens-of all these things, as the monuments of past
ages bear witness, the Catholic Church has always been the originator,
the promoter, or the guardian. Ever, therefore, consistent with
herself, while on the one hand she rejects that exorbitant liberty
which in individuals and in nations ends in license or in thraldom, on
the other hand, she willingly and most gladly welcomes whatever
improvements the age brings forth, if these really secure the
prosperity of life here below, which is, as it were, a stage in the
journey to the life that will know no ending.
39. Therefore, when it is said that the Church is hostile to modern
political regimes and that she repudiates the discoveries of modern
research, the charge is a ridiculous and groundless calumny. Wild
opinions she does repudiate, wicked and seditious projects she does
condemn, together with that attitude of mind which points to the
beginning of a willful departure from God. But, as all truth must
necessarily proceed from God, the Church recognizes in all truth that
is reached by research a trace of the divine intelligence. And as all
truth in the natural order is powerless to destroy belief in the
teachings of revelation, but can do much to confirm it, and as every
newly discovered truth may serve to further the knowledge or the praise
of God, it follows that whatsoever spreads the range of knowledge will
always be willingly and even joyfully welcomed by the Church. She will
always encourage and promote, as she does in other branches of
knowledge, all study occupied with the investigation of nature. In
these pursuits, should the human intellect discover anything not known
before, the Church makes no opposition. She never objects to search
being made for things that minister to the refinements and comforts of
life. So far, indeed, from opposing these she is now, as she ever has
been, hostile alone to indolence and sloth, and earnestly wishes that
the talents of men may bear more and more abundant fruit by cultivation
and exercise. Moreover, she gives encouragement to every kind of art
and handicraft, and through her influence, directing all strivings
after progress toward virtue and salvation, she labours to prevent
man's intellect and industry from turning him away from God and from
heavenly things.
40. All this, though so reasonable and full of counsel, finds little
favour nowadays when States not only refuse to conform to the rules of
Christian wisdom, but seem even anxious to recede from them further and
further on each successive day. Nevertheless, since truth when brought
to light is wont, of its own nature, to spread itself far and wide, and
gradually take possession of the minds of men, We, moved by the great
and holy duty of Our apostolic mission to all nations, speak, as We are
bound to do, with freedom. Our eyes are not closed to the spirit of the
times. We repudiate not the assured and useful improvements of our age,
but devoutly wish affairs of State to take a safer course than they are
now taking, and to rest on a more firm foundation without injury to the
true freedom of the people; for the best parent and guardian of liberty
amongst men is truth. "The truth shall make you free."(25)
41. If in the difficult times in which Our lot is cast, Catholics will
give ear to Us, as it behoves them to do, they will readily see what
are the duties of each one in matters of opinion as well as action. As
regards opinion, whatever the Roman Pontiffs have hitherto taught, or
shall hereafter teach, must be held with a firm grasp of mind, and, so
often as occasion requires, must be openly professed.
42. Especially with reference to the so-called "liberties" which are so
greatly coveted in these days, all must stand by the judgment of the
apostolic see, and have the same mind. Let no man be deceived by the
honest outward appearance of these liberties, but let each one reflect
whence these have had their origin, and by what efforts they are
everywhere upheld and promoted. Experience has made Us well acquainted
with their results to the State, since everywhere they have borne
fruits which the good and wise bitterly deplore. If there really exist
anywhere, or if we in imagination conceive, a State, waging wanton and
tyrannical war against Christianity, and if we compare with it the
modern form of government just described, this latter may seem the more
endurable of the two. Yet, undoubtedly, the principles on which such a
government is grounded are, as We have said, of a nature which no one
can approve.
43. Secondly, action may relate to private and domestic matters, or to
matters public. As to private affairs, the first duty is to conform
life and conduct to the gospel precepts, and to refuse to shrink from
this duty when Christian virtue demands some sacrifice slightly more
difficult to make. All, moreover, are bound to love the Church as their
common mother, to obey her laws, promote her honour, defend her rights,
and to endeavour to make her respected and loved by those over whom
they have authority. It is also of great moment to the public welfare
to take a prudent part in the business of municipal administration, and
to endeavour above all to introduce effectual measures, so that, as
becomes a Christian people, public provision may be made for the
instruction of youth in religion and true morality. Upon these things
the well-being of every State greatly depends.
44. Furthermore, it is in general fitting and salutary that Catholics
should extend their efforts beyond this restricted sphere, and give
their attention to national politics. We say "in general" because these
Our precepts are addressed to all nations. However, it may in some
places be true that, for most urgent and just reasons, it is by no
means expedient for Catholics to engage in public affairs or to take an
active part in politics. Nevertheless, as We have laid down, to take no
share in public matters would be as wrong as to have no concern for, or
to bestow no labour upon, the common good, and the more so because
Catholics are admonished, by the very doctrines which they profess, to
be upright and faithful in the discharge of duty, while, if they hold
aloof, men whose principles offer but small guarantee for the welfare
of the State will the more readily seize the reins of government. This
would tend also to the injury of the Christian religion, forasmuch as
those would come into power who are badly disposed toward the Church,
and those who are willing to befriend her would be deprived of all
influence.
45. It follows clearly, therefore, that Catholics have just reasons for
taking part in the conduct of public affairs. For in so doing they
assume not nor should they assume the responsibility of approving what
is blameworthy in the actual methods of government, but seek to turn
these very methods, so far as is possible, to the genuine and true
public good, and to use their best endeavours at the same time to
infuse, as it were, into all the veins of the State the healthy sap and
blood of Christian wisdom and virtue. The morals and ambitions of the
heathens differed widely from those of the Gospel, yet Christians were
to be seen living undefiled everywhere in the midst of pagan
superstition, and, while always true to themselves, coming to the front
boldly wherever an opening was presented. Models of loyalty to their
rulers, submissive, so far as was permitted, to the sovereign power,
they shed around them on every side a halo of sanctity; they strove to
be helpful to their brethren, and to attract others to the wisdom of
Jesus Christ, yet were bravely ready to withdraw from public life, nay,
even to lay down their life, if they could not without loss of virtue
retain honours, dignities, and offices. For this reason, Christian ways
and manners speedily found their way not only into private houses but
into the camp, the senate, and even into the imperial palaces. "We are
but of yesterday," wrote Tertullian, "yet we swarm in all your
institutions, we crowd your cities, islands, villages, towns,
assemblies, the army itself, your wards and corporations, the palace,
the senate, and the law courts."(26) So that the Christian faith, when
once it became lawful to make public profession of the Gospel, appeared
in most of the cities of Europe, not like an infant crying in its
cradle, but already grown up and full of vigour.
46. In these Our days it is well to revive these examples of Our
forefathers. First and foremost, it is the duty of all Catholics worthy
of the name and wishful to be known as most loving children of the
Church, to reject without swerving whatever is inconsistent with so
fair a title; to make use of popular institutions, so far as can
honestly be done, for the advancement of truth and righteousness; to
strive that liberty of action shall not transgress the bounds marked
out by nature and the law of God; to endeavour to bring back all civil
society to the pattern and form of Christianity which We have
described. It is barely possible to lay down any fixed method by which
such purposes are to be attained, because the means adopted must suit
places and times widely differing from one another. Nevertheless, above
all things, unity of aim must be preserved, and similarity must be
sought after in all plans of action. Both these objects will be carried
into effect without fail if all will follow the guidance of the
apostolic see as their rule of life and obey the bishops whom the Holy
Spirit has placed to rule the Church of God.(27) The defense of
Catholicism, indeed, necessarily demands that in the profession of
doctrines taught by the Church all shall be of one mind and all
steadfast in believing; and care must be taken never to connive, in any
way, at false opinions, never to withstand them less strenuously than
truth allows. In mere matters of opinion it is permissible to discuss
things with moderation, with a desire of searching into the truth,
without unjust suspicion or angry recriminations.
47. Hence, lest concord be broken by rash charges, let this be
understood by all, that the integrity of Catholic faith cannot be
reconciled with opinions verging on naturalism or rationalism, the
essence of which is utterly to do away with Christian institutions and
to install in society the supremacy of man to the exclusion of God.
Further, it is unlawful to follow one line of conduct in private life
and another in public, respecting privately the authority of the
Church, but publicly rejecting it; for this would amount to joining
together good and evil, and to putting man in conflict with himself;
whereas he ought always to be consistent, and never in the least point
nor in any condition of life to swerve from Christian virtue.
48. But in matters merely political, as, for instance, the best form of
government, and this or that system of administration, a difference of
opinion is lawful. Those, therefore, whose piety is in other respects
known, and whose minds are ready to accept in all obedience the decrees
of the apostolic see, cannot in justice be accounted as bad men because
they disagree as to subjects We have mentioned; and still graver wrong
will be done them, if - as We have more than once perceived with regret
- they are accused of violating, or of wavering in, the Catholic faith.
49. Let this be well borne in mind by all who are in the habit of
publishing their opinions, and above all by journalists. In the
endeavour to secure interests of the highest order there is no room for
intestine strife or party rivalries; since all should aim with one mind
and purpose to make safe that which is the common object of all - the
maintenance of religion and of the State. If, therefore, they have
hitherto been dissensions, let them henceforth be gladly buried in
oblivion. If rash or injurious acts have been committed, whoever may
have been at fault, let mutual charity make amends, and let the past be
redeemed by a special submission of all to the apostolic see. In this
way Catholics will attain two most excellent results: they will become
helpers to the Church in preserving and propagating Christian wisdom,
and they will confer the greatest benefit on civil society, the safety
of which is exceedingly imperiled by evil teachings and bad passions.
50. This, venerable brethren, is what We have thought it Our duty to
expound to all nations of the Catholic world touching the Christian
constitution of States and the duties of individual citizens. It
behoves Us now with earnest prayer to implore the protection of heaven,
beseeching God, who alone can enlighten the minds of men and move their
will, to bring about those happy ends for which We yearn and strive,
for His greater glory and the general salvation of mankind. As a happy
augury of the divine benefits, and in token of Our paternal
benevolence, to you, venerable brothers, and to the clergy and to the
whole people committed to your charge and vigilance, We grant lovingly
in the Lord the apostolic benediction.
Given at St. Peter's in Rome, the first day of November, 1885, the
seventh year of Our pontificate.
LEO XIII
REFERENCES:
1. Rom. 13:1.
2. Wisd. 6:7.
3. Rom. 13:1.
4. Rom. 13:2.
5. John 20:21.
6. Matt. 28:20.
7. John 10:10.
8. Mark 16:15.
9. Matt. 16:19.
10. John 21:16-17.
11. Luke 22:32.
12. Matt. 28:18-20.
13. Matt. 18:12.
14. 2 Cor. 10:6.
15. 2 Cor. 13:10.
16. Acts 5:29.
17. Rom. 13:1.
18. Sacr. Imp. ad Cyrillum Alexand. et Episcopos metrop.; See Labbeus,
Collect. Conc., Vol. 3.
19. De moribus ecclesiae, 1, cap. 30, n. 63 (PL 32, 1336).
20. Epist. 138 ad Marcellinum, cap. 2, n. 15 (PL 33, 532).
21. Epist. 238, to Pope Paschal II (PL 162, 246B).
22. Pope Pius IX, encyclical Quanta Cura (Dec. 8, 1864): Syllabus. It
will suffice to indicate a few of them: Prop. 19. The Church is not a
true, perfect, and wholly independent society, possessing in its own
unchanging rights conferred upon it by its divine Founder; but it is
for the civil power to determine what are the rights of the Church, and
the limits within which it may use them. Prop. 29. The State, as the
origin and source of all rights, enjoys a right that is unlimited.
Prop. 55. The Church must be separated from the Stare and the State
from the Church. Prop. 79. It is unsure that the civil liberty of every
form of worship, and the full power given to all of openly and publicly
manifesting whatsoever opinions and thoughts, lead to the more ready
corruption of the minds and morals of the people, and to the spread of
the plague of religious indifference.
23. 1 Peter 2:16.
24. John 8:34.
25. John 8:32.
26. Apoplget, 27 (P4 1, 525).
27. Acts 20:28.
|